US Executive
The US executive plays a central role in both high level politics and everyday governance. In terms of high politics, the president is responsible for conducting international diplomacy, leading the military as commander in chief, shaping national security policy, and representing the United States on the global stage. However, the executive branch also engages in more routine, administrative tasks such as formulating and implementing domestic policy, managing federal agencies, and ensuring that laws passed by Congress are properly enforced.
Structurally, the US executive is based on the principle of separation of powers. This means that the president leads the executive branch independently of both Congress and the judiciary. Unlike the UK system, where the executive emerges from the legislature and has to maintain the confidence of Parliament, the US president is elected separately and does not sit in Congress. While this provides some autonomy, it also places the president within a framework of checks and balances to prevent excessive power.
The US president is often considered the most powerful political figure in the country. However, unlike the UK Prime Minister, whose power largely comes from conventions and political authority, the president’s powers are clearly defined in the US Constitution. Article II of the Constitution outlines the president's formal powers, including the ability to veto legislation, appoint federal officials (such as Cabinet members, ambassadors, and judges), act as commander in chief of the armed forces, negotiate and sign treaties (with Senate approval), and grant pardons. These powers are legally entrenched and require varying levels of approval from Congress, particularly the Senate.
Aside from these formal powers, the president also has the ability to issue executive orders and directives. These are used to instruct federal agencies and shape policy within the boundaries of existing law. Although they do not create new laws, executive orders can have significant impact, as seen in President Biden’s reversal of many of Donald Trump’s environmental policies. In addition, the president sets the political agenda for the nation, often using the State of the Union address, press briefings, and public speeches to influence legislative priorities. While the president cannot propose bills directly, they work closely with party leaders in Congress to shape legislative initiatives.
In times of national emergency or war, the president often assumes expanded powers. For example, President George W. Bush significantly increased executive authority following the 9/11 attacks, especially in matters of national security and surveillance. These periods often redefine the scope of presidential authority, although they are subject to review by Congress and the courts.
Informal powers also play a key role in shaping a president’s effectiveness. These powers vary depending on the individual’s leadership style, communication skills, and ability to unify their party or appeal to the public. Presidents such as Ronald Reagan and Barack Obama were known for their charisma and persuasive communication, whereas others have struggled with party management or public approval.
The US Cabinet is made up of the heads of 15 executive departments, such as Defence, State, and Education. Each member runs a major federal agency and advises the president within their area of expertise. However, Cabinet meetings in the US are less influential than those in the UK. They are not regular forums for policy debate and are not a place of collective decision making. Instead, most strategic decision making occurs within the Executive Office of the President, commonly referred to as the EOP.
The Executive Office of the President serves as the central nerve centre of the US executive. It includes several key advisory bodies, such as the National Security Council, the Office of Management and Budget, and the Council of Economic Advisers. The White House Chief of Staff is often the president’s most senior advisor and helps coordinate the work of the EOP. This structure allows the president to bypass Cabinet departments when necessary and exert tighter control over both messaging and policy execution.
In the US, executive accountability functions differently than in the UK. There is no system of collective cabinet responsibility. Instead, accountability is largely individual. Cabinet secretaries and department heads are expected to resign or be dismissed if they fail in their duties or become embroiled in political scandal. Examples include Donald Rumsfeld, who resigned over criticism of the Iraq War, and Scott Pruitt, who left the Environmental Protection Agency under ethical pressure during the Trump administration.
Oversight is also maintained by Congress through a range of powers. Congressional committees can investigate executive actions, withhold funding for programs, block presidential appointments, and in extreme cases, impeach federal officials including the president. Notable cases include the impeachment proceedings against Bill Clinton and Donald Trump, and the almost impeachment of Richard Nixon during the Watergate scandal.
Although the president does not write laws, they play a critical role in the legislative process. They propose primary legislation through public speeches and by working with Congressional allies. They also have the power to sign or veto bills passed by Congress. A veto can only be overridden by a two thirds majority in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, which is difficult to achieve. An example of this power in action is President Obama’s veto of the Keystone XL pipeline bill in 2015, which Congress failed to override. Additionally, the president may issue signing statements when enacting legislation to outline their interpretation of the law and how it should be enforced.
The power of the president can expand or contract depending on the political context. When the president’s party controls both chambers of Congress, as it did during Trump’s first two years in office, the executive can act quickly and decisively. However, when government is divided, legislative gridlock is common. Presidential power is also shaped by the judiciary. For example, President Biden’s student loan forgiveness plan was struck down by the Supreme Court in 2023, highlighting the limits of executive action.
Public opinion also plays a vital role. Presidents with high approval ratings are generally better positioned to pass legislation and lead effectively, whereas those with low popularity often find their power limited. Finally, national emergencies tend to temporarily increase presidential power, although this is often contested after the fact.
In comparison to the UK, the US executive is more formally constrained by law and institutional checks. The president operates separately from the legislature, whereas the UK Prime Minister leads the government from within Parliament. The UK system relies more heavily on political conventions and collective cabinet responsibility, whereas the US model emphasises legal frameworks, individual accountability, and a separation of powers.
© Copyright mypoliticsnotes