mypoliticsnotes

Democracy

Direct democracy is often known as a pure form of democracy. It is where people decide on policy directly through referendums or even a show of hands at public meetings. The UK doesn’t use referendums as much as some other countries. The government typically calls one when it feels necessary — the last major example being the Brexit referendum. In countries such as Switzerland and the United States, people can trigger a referendum themselves through a petition, a process known as an initiative.

Direct democracy works well at a small, local level, but when applied to an entire country, it becomes harder to implement. It is time-consuming, expensive, and often divisive. Even when a decision is made, the issue may remain contested, and debate may continue. Another difficulty is that referendums tend to reduce complex issues to simple yes or no questions. For example, “Should Scotland be an independent country?” offers only two answers, when in reality there are several possible positions and consequences to consider.

Some types of direct democracy could include citizen initiatives, where mechanisms are introduced allowing citizens to propose legislation or constitutional amendments through petitions. If a certain number of signatures is reached, the proposal would then be put to a referendum. We could also see an increasing use of referendums or the development of secure online voting systems to make direct public participation in decision-making easier and more accessible.

So why is democracy a good thing?

There are significant problems with First Past the Post, which does not produce truly representative results. The number of seats won does not reflect the national share of votes, and the system tends to produce an unrepresentative Parliament — often dominated by white men. The party system means that MPs frequently follow party leaders’ orders rather than reflecting the interests of voters. Direct democracy offers a different kind of accountability, where citizens can bypass party politics and engage directly with decision-making. This can help re-engage those who feel disillusioned with the current system. For example, turnout for the Brexit referendum was higher than for the 2019 general election, possibly because people felt their votes mattered more.

In the current political climate, trust in politicians is low. This has been made worse by Boris Johnson’s unlawful prorogation of Parliament, the misleading NHS bus claim that promised £350 million a week for the NHS, and the Liberal Democrats’ 2010 pledge to oppose tuition fee increases, only to then triple fees in coalition. Combined with frequent negative portrayals of politics in the media, many people have lost interest. Direct democracy could help restore trust by giving citizens a more direct voice in decisions.

There are, however, many criticisms of direct democracy. It is very difficult to reach agreement in a modern state with millions of people. It can result in tyranny of the majority, where minority voices are ignored or marginalised. For example, in the Brexit referendum, 48% of voters chose to remain in the EU — yet the result favoured leaving.

Another issue is misinformation. Campaigns can mislead voters, and there is often no way to hold people accountable for false claims. Populism and demagoguery are also dangers. Direct democracy can be influenced by charismatic leaders or populist movements who appeal to emotion instead of reason, leading to poor decisions. This was evident in the 2014 Scottish referendum, where the No campaign — often called ‘Project Fear’ — focused on the risks of independence. Critics argued this was a fear-based strategy designed to manipulate voters rather than encourage genuine debate.

Direct democracy can also be dangerous because voters may make uninformed decisions. In the age of social media, it is easy to be misled by fake news or stuck in an echo chamber. For example, during the 2011 AV referendum, many people did not understand the voting system being proposed. Both the Yes and No campaigns were criticised for scoring political points rather than helping voters understand the issue. Ultimately, 68% voted No, but turnout was only 42%.

Another issue is turnout itself. If only a small number of people vote, decisions may not reflect the broader public interest. For instance, the AV referendum had 42% turnout, meaning 58% of the population did not take part. Many of these problems are less frequent in representative democracy.

Representative democracy — sometimes referred to as indirect or liberal democracy — is where people vote for others to represent them and make decisions on their behalf. In the UK, this takes the form of regular elections, secret ballots, and a choice of candidates. The government is accountable to the people, and its power is limited by institutions such as a free press and the protection of individual rights like free speech.

There are several advantages. Most people do not have the time, interest, or knowledge to make regular political decisions. Elected representatives can study the issues in depth, consider the interests of all groups in society — including minorities — and make informed decisions. They can also be held accountable for their actions.

However, there are some disadvantages. Representatives may distort or ignore the demands of voters to suit their own political agendas. It’s also debatable how accountable MPs really are. For example, the Recall of MPs Act 2015 allows for MPs to be recalled in specific situations, such as being convicted of a criminal offence and receiving a custodial sentence. However, this process is far more limited than recall systems in places like the United States, where citizens can trigger a recall through a petition. In the UK, constituents cannot directly recall their MP.

Participatory democracy is another form of democracy where citizens are expected — or at least allowed — to play a more active role. It often includes higher levels of direct democracy and greater engagement from the public.

Recent developments in participatory democracy include online petitions. Platforms like Change.org and the UK Government’s official petition website have made it easier to start and sign petitions. For example, a petition to revoke Article 50 and remain in the EU gained millions of signatures, showing widespread public interest. However, petitions do not always lead to meaningful policy change.

Another development is social media activism. Platforms like Twitter, Facebook and Instagram have become powerful tools for raising awareness and mobilising support. Movements such as #BlackLivesMatter and #MeToo have gained global attention and pressured governments to act. However, social media also raises concerns. It can reinforce echo chambers, spread misinformation, and allow for online abuse, which undermines serious political debate.

Finally, citizen assemblies have become more common. These are groups of randomly selected people brought together to discuss key issues and make recommendations. For example, the UK Climate Assembly gathered over 100 people to consider ways of tackling climate change and advise the government.

© Copyright mypoliticsnotes